MIKE WAITE served in the Dorset Police for 20 years as a police motorcycle instructor training police officers to the very highest level of high-speed pursuit riding. Now you can buy his expert training DVD on Amazon.co.uk & Amazon.com.
Dear Mike, Got your video today, sat and watched......first roundabout you come to, down goes your right leg - the Examiner over here would fail you for that...then you continue throughout the video and never once use a lifesaver - he would fail you for that too, especially when you are preparing to turn left off a roundabout......I would have thought that a professional video would have obtained the highest possible standard and that any mistakes (such as being in the right lane approaching a r/bout when actually wishing to go left) would have been edited out. I bought the video with the intention of providing it to assist those who wish to become more advanced in their riding skills (I am an Instructor for the BMFRTS) and also to help those who wish to become Instructors. Now I will still use the video, because it is useful for showing the vanishing point, etc, but I will also be asking the viewer to note your simple errors as an example of how not to ride! take care out there. [From Mike] Thanks for the input. This video is about advanced riding and not DSA novice riders. I will qualify everything that you have pointed out. Which foot to put down. We put the foot down and I mean any foot which has an advantage. If I am stopping I would have finished my braking and so I hold the bike on the front brake. This allows me to have my foot over the gear stick so I can select neutral if required. Note it has been the DSA speciality to put left foot down to cover the front and rear brake. This is a nonsense and thought up by the DSA around a table. In advanced police riding it is in everybody’s interest to use the grey matter and not to stick to some civilian nonsense. As far as the roundabout is concerned, you are right about me being in the wrong lane. At that point of the film I was not aware which way to go, as the road was not familiar to me. As you can see I have purposively left it in just to show there is no perfect rider out there and even the best of us get it wrong. Lifesavers. You use a life saver if you are uncertain of the view behind at any stage. If rear view mirrors are up dated regularly in my opinion not required. I have written a document about advanced police riding techniques. Below is the advice I give regarding shoulder checks. 11.10 Shoulder checks Be a firm believer in extensive use of the rear-view mirrors. Shoulder checks should be used when one is uncertain about restricted views to the rear, or where a view has not been taken in the mirror for some time. Use them when you feel they are required. Shoulder checks for overtakes need not be used if the view has been cleared in the mirrors. Rear- view mirrors should be updated several times on the lead up to an overtake. If a rider wants to use shoulder checks that is no problem, but advise him regarding his mirrors. The danger of shoulder checks when in an overtaking position is that as the rider turns his head, the vehicle in front may brake causing problems. The rider needs his eyes up ahead. I am glad you found one or two items worthy of your instructional techniques. My advice to you is don't be so rigid in your approach. Motorcycling is fun and highly skilful. I wish you every success with you instructing. If you have any other points I will be delighted to give you my opinion. Kind regards, MikeColin Ratcliffe from Omagh
For the last few years many local authorities have been going over board with the question of speed. Many decisions have been taken which in my opinion are being called politically correct, and nothing to do with road safety.
The driving public, the silent majority, were first bemused I would suspect regarding many changing speed limits and later despairing at many of the limits imposed, that local drivers could only describe as policies gone mad.
Take a case in my local area the A357, a small stretch of road, which runs from Wincanton down to the A30 at Henstridge a distance I would say is approximately 4 to 5 miles in length. The road is a typical country road with a sparse selection of houses. It is of a good surface a good line of sight and is as one would expect in this location a bendy road. There are a few junctions leading from minor roads. Before the local politicians got their hands on it, it had a national speed limit of 60mph. The exception was through built up areas, the villages, which have a 30 mph limit imposed.
To many drivers who enjoy driving it would be classified as a delight to drive with good line of sight to all junctions, except two, for traffic from the Wincanton towards Henstridge direction. There are signs, which indicated the junctions. The local authority in there political correct thoughts decided that this road had become so dangerous that a speed restriction was urgently required. The result is that the road is now almost in its entire length a 30 to 40 mph system.
The driving public soon realised that the speeds that has been put in place were so stupid as to be dangerous. The reason I say this is as follows. On seeing any speed restriction driver gets a birds eye view of what the problems or situations are. With good lines of sight, what on earth does a 30 mph speed limit have to do with safety? It instantly brings the speed limit into disrepute. What it is telling us that the vast majority of the public are so stupid that if we do not adhere to this limit they are in mortal danger. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence can see that the road is perfectly safe as no danger can possibly happen at reasonable higher speeds. The result is that many drivers will not conform and consistently break the new limit. This degenerates into the frustrated drivers attempting to overtake slower drivers who adhere to the speed limit, which in it self creates more danger than there ever was or perceived to be. It also has the affect of bunching vehicles closer together where before there was never a problem. This has a knock on effect.
There are so many examples of stupid speed limits being put into place all over the country including the inappropriate placing of speed cameras, joined up now with civilian teams to catch motorists, that real speed limits which are required, are being brought into disrespect and or ignored. I would like to see the professional drivers from the police traffic departments take a much more direct action. They should be able to recommend a speed limit that they think appropriate for all stretches of roads. I believe that the people who are making decisions regarding speed are not trained or have a professional background to do an honest assessment. All you have is a few non drivers or haters of cars who make unfounded complaints that get action to the detriment of us all.
I do not think there are many drivers who would not accept that speed limits are required at some locations. Cameras should be placed at black spots. Cameras for drivers jumping red lights. Speed limits imposed near schools (During school opening times) Dangerous junctions with the appropriate signs displayed. Has it occurred to local authorities that unsighted junctions, with a small amount of intelligence would be better served by good engineering? Look at the vast majority of unsighted junctions which could be developed to much better lines of sight by just cutting back an overgrown hedge, or redesigning the junction so as to give motorists a good view from both directions. In some cases the reconstruction of an exit to a more suitable location. Widening of some roads would eliminate lots of problems. I have no problem with speed limits if they are sensible and fair not just for the driver but pedestrians and I suggest most drivers feel the same. There will always be that small element of dangerous drivers who will flout the law even when it is justified who will not comply with any restriction.
To classify us all as mad and bad or as now preserved a moneymaking business is a dangerous route to take and turns the general driving public into an angered and disillusioned majority. One observation I would like to point out is as follows. Speed cameras and enforcement has now become a business. To survive, a business must generate profits just like any other business. It would there for be logical that to take the business forward it must have plans to keep profits up and expanding. How does one achieve this? The obvious answer is to give the purchaser (the driver) the opportunity to spend more of his hard earned money by encouraging him to exceed the speed limit. With stupid speed restrictions and unrestricted sighting of cameras at inappropriate locations it will keep the business flourishing and growing. It has already been forecast that the speed restrictions imposed will generate millions of pounds more in the coming years. I have no confidence with any politician who states that the placing of cameras are justified, because like politicians worldwide they can always say that their policy is working when the vast majority of the public can see through their deceit.
To conclude, the use of ridiculous speed restrictions are so far advanced as to make a mockery of proper and required speed limits and so bring speed limits into disrepute. The decisions of those in charge are making the public so apathetic that no one believes what they say and brings the law into disrepute.
Finally the police. The Chief officers in charge direct their officers or should direct them to priorities. By allowing speed to become political they become alienated from the publics' good will. As a nation we were always seen as a tolerant society with a high sense of fair play. It is the British tradition to laugh at ourselves. We are no longer laughing at this creeping correctness. This is rapidly disappearing into a Britain I no longer like the look of.
Mike Waite ex-police motorcycle instructor.
Copyright Mike Waite - Teaching motorcyclists advanced Police riding techniques for faster safer biking!Sign in